We designed this website to provide
information to consumers, injured
people, and their families. Our goal is
to level the playing field between
consumers and insurance companies
and expose the tricks, traps, and
techniques they use to cheat injured
people out of their legal rights. We
also let consumers know about legal
news, including verdicts and
settlements and other interesting
legal information.
But please understand that nothing on
this website is meant to provide legal
information about your specific case,
create an attorney-client relationship,
or imply that the results of your legal
case will be the same as some other
case.
Find Answers to Your Question By Searching Here
What Law Covers Diving Accidents & Injuries?
Diving Accident Law \n \nWe handle diving accident and injury cases. One of the first questions in these cases, particularly in commercial diving cases, is whether the Jones Act covers commercial divers. \n \nIn 1992, in Ashley v. Epic Divers, Inc., the dive company argued that one of its employees, a freelance diver, was not a Jones Act seaman. The Court agreed. The Court reasoned that the diver was assigned to different vessels owned by differet owners and was therefore not a Jones Act seaman. \n \nDive companies have used this ruling to argue that divers only get Longshore benefits under the Longshore & Harbor Worker's Compensation Act. \n \nIn 1995, 1997, and 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a series of opinions that provided some additional guidance on the question "Who is a seaman?" In these opinions, the Court focuses on the nature of the worker's work, not on some arbitrary "snapshot" test. \n \nCurrently, most commercial divers who are injured offshore will be Jones Act seamen. But like in most maritime and Jones Act cases, when you hire a lawyer, you need to hire a dive accident lawyer, not a general practitioner, or you risk losing lots of legal rights. \n \nDiving Accident & Injuries - Proving Negligence \n \nGenerally, diving companies are responsible for diving accidents & injuries if they are guilty of doing something that a reasonably prudent diving company would not do. \n \nWhat this basically means is that diving companies must follow standard policies and procedures, Coast Guard regulations, etc. \n \nUnfortunately, in too many cases, the diving company fails to follow standard procedures or cuts corners on safety, resulting in serious diving injuries or even death. \n \nThe following are some examples of situations where a dive accident occured as a result of company negligence: \n \n-lmproper decompression tables \n-improper use of decompression tables \n-using experimental tables \n-operating outside the dive table limits \n-ascending too fast \n-improper medical treatment \n-using improper equipment \n-not enough manpower \n-operating unsafely \n-violating company or Coast Guard policies, or having inadequte or inappropriate company policies. \n \nDiving injuries and accidents can be very serious, even life threatening. If you have experience a diving accident or injury, you should seek experienced legal representation in the form of a diving accident lawyer. To learn more about the Jones Act and maritime law, please visit the other posts on this website, or visit our main page at www.vbattorneys.com.