Interested in working with us? Call us on 1.877.724.7800 or fill out this quick form and we will contact you within 24 hours!




Maritime Information

What Our Clients Say

View All

Disclaimer

We designed this website to provide information to consumers, injured people, and their families. Our goal is to level the playing field between consumers and insurance companies and expose the tricks, traps, and techniques they use to cheat injured people out of their legal rights. We also let consumers know about legal news, including verdicts and settlements and other interesting legal information.

But please understand that nothing on this website is meant to provide legal information about your specific case, create an attorney-client relationship, or imply that the results of your legal case will be the same as some other case.

Vujasinovic & Beckcom Blog

Vujasinovic & Beckcom Blog
Blog Category:

Jones Act

8/21/2009
Michael Rawlins
Comments (0)

Jones Act lawsuit dismissed because accident did not occur on a "vessel"

A federal court denied the slip and fall claim of an insulation installer, stating that the amphibious transport dock he was working on did not fall under maritime law.

George Casas, Texas resident, alleged negligence against defendants Joiner and Northrup Grumman, his employers, after being injured while installing the insulation beneath an unfinished floor suspended 12 to 18 inches above the bottom.

Citing employer negligence, Casas claimed he slipped, fell and herniated numerous disks in his back while traversing raised metal beams on the dock under construction in the Northrup Shipyard.

The U.S. Southern District of Mississippi court denied his claim, ruling that the barge he worked on was not a vessel, and that the case was ineligible under maritime law.

The plaintiff also failed on the grounds of suing the wrong party.

The court ruled that sub-contractor Land Coast, his direct employer, did in fact have prior knowledge of dangerous working conditions. However, Land Coast was not a party in this case and Casas failed to prove that Joiner, the contractor, did have prior knowledge. Casas also did not demonstrate that Joiner had a duty to cover the scaffold with plywood.

The lawsuit was initially filed in Hidalgo County, Texas, moved to Southern District of Texas and re-filed in the Mississippi court after being dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Want to know more about back injury cases that occur offshore?

Feel free to call our firm's toll free number, 877.724.7800 , or send us an email through this website, and we would be glad to schedule an appointment with the firm's maritime lawyer, Brian Beckcom.

Or you can download Brian's free Insider's Guide to Winning Your Maritime Injury Case





Jones Act | Maritime Lawyer | Maritime Attorney | Maritime Law



There are no comments.

Post a comment

Post a Comment to "Jones Act lawsuit dismissed because accident did not occur on a "vessel""

To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."

Name:*

Email:* (will not be published)

Website:

Message:

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

For security purposes, please enter the graphic text in the box below: [hit F5 if you can not read the text]